Wednesday, May 10, 2017

This Day in History - Germany Attacks [May 10,1940 - Part 2]

The Maginot Line was France’s first line of defense against a German attack.  It was manned by half a million French soldiers.  It was the most elaborate, the most expensive set of fortifications ever built at the time.  These fortifications would halt the Germans, providing the Germans attacked in that direction.  The Maginot Line extended from the along the French border from Switzerland to Belgium.  It stopped 250 miles short of the English Channel.  The French strategists argued it best to fight the Germans in Belgium if not Germany itself.  It was too expensive to extend the Maginot Line all the way to the Channel, and the French didn’t want the Belgians to think that France would abandon them to the Germans when the attack came.  But King Leopold opted for neutrality in 1936. He closed the Belgian border to French military observers.  The French were very defensive-minded in their military thinking.  Most of their tactics were derived from the First World War.  They, like the British, didn’t want a repeat of the carnage of World War I.   The French had done much to introduce the tank and the airplane to warfare, but had done little to develop them.  They had made advancements in mechanized transport, but reverted to using horses and railways.

German thinking was just the opposite.  They too didn’t want a repeat of the First World War, especially since they’re the ones who lost it.  During the interwar years, Heinz Guderian wrote his thoughts on armored warfare in a book Achtung Panzer!  

Achtung Panzer! is not just a work of theory that was intended to help Germany prepare for the warfare of the future.  It is also a historical work.  More than half the book is dedicated to analysis of how tanks were used on the Western Front in World War I.  It emphasizes on how tanks came into existence, the technical development of tanks, the organizational development of the tanks corps, and the actual experience of tank operations.  Guderian was lucky to have a patron who agreed with him [General Oswald Lutz].  Lutz was the Inspector of the Transport Troops, which was charged with motorizing the German army.  Guderian was soon to become Lutz’s chief of staff.  It was in this job that Lutz encouraged Guderian to develop his armored warfare theories, even going as far as to order him to write a book about it [Achtung Panzer!]. 

The things Guderian wrote about in 1936-37 are commonplace today, but in his era, it was a revolution in tactical thinking.  Guderian was multilingual.  He spoke French fluently, and was almost as good at English.  He studied the works of British maneuver warfare theorists [Swinton, J.F.C. Fuller, B.H. Liddell Hart, and Giffard Martel], as well as one French tank advocate named Charles de Gaulle.  He read everything he could get ahold of from these sources, and met face-to-face with German tank veterans from World War I.  So sharp was Guderian that he became a recognized tank expert before he ever set foot in a tank.  Guderian’s thinking was close to that of Mikhail Tukhachevsky, the author of the Deep Battle doctrine [Guderian had seen Russian armor for himself], though Tukhachevsky is not mentioned by name.  Guderian had an audience [Adolf Hitler] that was more receptive to what he had to say than his British, French and Russian/Soviet counterparts.

Prior to World War I, Guderian was attached to a telegraph unit.  During World War, I he became a radio specialist and it was here he developed his appreciation for the use of “signals” as a means of enhancing command and control of armored units.  In 1930, he took command of a motor transport battalion.   This unit was equipped with some armored cars, motorcycles, anti-tank guns and dummy tanks [The Versailles Treaty forbid the Germans from having tanks].  Because the Versailles Treaty limited the size of the Reichswehr to only 100,000 men, the ten-pound brains in the German army [they weren’t allowed to have a General Staff either] had to find a way to create an effective, highly mobile force to meet contingencies.  Guderian’s unit was charged with demonstrating how different mechanized combat arms could work together.  The lessons he learned from World War I include: 1) Tanks should be used in large groups; 2) Tanks should not be wasted on unsuitable ground like swamps; 3) Tanks are best used when you have the element of surprise.  His instructions were clear – strike hard, and quickly, and don’t disperse your forces.  Hit the enemy with a fist – don’t poke them with fingers.  His thoughts about other combat arms included:

Infantry – called “the Queen of battle” by many, but not so Guderian.  He saw infantry as a supporting combat arm rather than a supported combat arm.  He thought infantry needed to be combined in fully motorized formations with other traditional supporting arms – engineers and artillery – all in support of tanks. 

Engineers – go out and find mines, provide pathways over waterways [build bridges], provide means to traverse swamps or other soft ground, reinforce bridges that are too weak to support tanks

Artillery – must be fast-moving, must be sufficiently well-protected to keep up with tanks. Suppress targets and geographical features that tanks can’t take on by themselves.  Long bombardments chew up ground, makes it difficult for tanks to maneuver, betrays the location of impending attack, permits defenders to enhance the readiness of reinforcements.  Joint training of artillery and tanks is a must. 

Aircraft – Guderian stressed the impact of airpower on operations of the Western Front.  Aircraft created disorder in German rear areas, hindered the movement of reserves, and brought German batteries under actual attack.  Because of their “great speed, range and effect on target,” aircraft became an offensive weapon of the first order. 

The French did have a plan.  If the Germans attacked through Belgium like they did in World War I, 40 French divisions, along with 10 divisions of British troops [the British Expeditionary Force (BEF)], would move into neutral Belgium to meet them.  The plan was to re-fight the First World War.  The French commander, General Gamelin, looked at the map and decided to guard the Ardennes Forest with 10 of his weakest, worst equipped divisions.  To the French, the Ardennes were impenetrable.  The Germans knew what opposed them in this sector.  They also knew the French had more tanks, better and heavier tanks, but had dispersed them throughout the army.  The Germans had a different idea. 

Erich von Manstein was Gerd von Rundstedt’s Chief of Staff when he served in Army Group A in 1939-40.  When he saw the original plan to attack France he saw a plan that was not a recipe for swift and decisive victory over the Allies.  He saw a plan in which the bulk of the attack would happen north of France through Belgium.  At first he thought it was a rerun of the Von Schlieffen Plan used to attack France in the First World War.  In that plan, the armies moved like a wheel through Belgium, sweeping along the English Channel coast and then heading south toward Paris.  Upon further review, he still saw that the northern forces [Army Group B] would head straight for the Channel coast, which would allow the Allies to counterattack its southern flank [see Map 3 below].  What he proposed [and Hitler eventually agreed to] was to shift the bulk of the attack from Army Group B to the more southern Army Group A.  While Army Group B would attack through Belgium like it would have in the original plan, a more beefed-up Army Group A would attack through the Ardennes, make a breakthrough, get into the enemy’s rear and make a dash for the Channel [see Map 4 below].  His proposal was like a Von Schlieffen Plan in reverse.  Once the breakthrough was made, Army Group A would swing to the northwest while Army Group B pressed directly west, thus catching the Allies in a pincer, cut off from the rest of France.  With the bulk of the French and British armies cut off from France, France would be ripe for the taking.  The French received reports of 50 German divisions on the move.  They even found out the day of the attack, but they preferred to “wait for events”.


The waiting ended on May 10th.  At 5:30am, the Germans attacked neutral Holland from the air.  Their targets were the bridges over the Maas River [Meuse in France and Belgium].  The boldness of the German attack stunned the Dutch.  Dutch soldiers surrendered in large groups.  The Germans had stunning success in Belgium as well.  Glider troops landed on the roof of Fort Eben Emael, the largest fort in the world at the time, and was the lynchpin of Gamelin’s defensive line.  Gamelin moved his 50 divisions north into Belgium and Holland, straight into the trap the Germans set for them.  The column of troops heading through Luxembourg was a target-rich environment for Allied aircraft, but they were too busy covering the French/British advance into Belgium.  The Luftwaffe hit Allied airfields, catching many aircraft on the ground while they were lined up in neat rows. fThe Luftwaffe attacked Fifty Allied airfields on that first day. 

On the third day of the German offensive, the panzers reached Sedan. Of historical note, Sedan was the place where the Prussians captured French Emperor Napoleon III during the Franco-Prussian War.  Gamelin didn’t think the panzers could get that far so fast.  According to his calculations, the Germans were six days ahead of schedule.  The French had blown all the bridges over the Meuse except for one.  The Germans found a weir to cross 40 miles north of Sedan.  A panzer division commanded by Erwin Rommel found this weir relatively unguarded.  As Rommel got his tanks across the Meuse, the Luftwaffe went into action near Sedan.  Gamelin and his generals were target-fixated on what was going on in Belgium.  By the end of the fourth day of the attack [May 13th], German infantry were across the Meuse in large numbers, and German engineers were building bridges across the Meuse to get more panzers across. 

The French tried to counterattack Army Group A, but their attacks were poorly organized.  On May 14th, the Allied air forces attacked the German bridges over the Meuse, but Allied losses were heavy.  Only 50 percent of the planes that made the attack returned to base.  After May 14th, the Luftwaffe had achieved air superiority.  Holland surrendered that same day.  After the German victory at Sedan, Gamelin thought the Germans would head straight for Paris, so he pulled troops away from the Meuse to protect the capital.  That move just gave the Germans more room for maneuver to make their dash for the Channel coast.  Brussels fell on May 17th, and on that same day Gamelin was relieved.  He was replaced by General Weygand, who was recalled from virtual retirement in Syria.  A 73-year old general was replacing a 68-year old general.  The French were desperate.  Marshal Henri Petain also became Deputy Prime Minister, and he was 84.  At that time, Petain was the French Ambassador to Spain.  Before he left Spain, Petain told Franco that his country was beaten, a result of “30 years of Marxism”.  French troops surrendered by the thousands. 

On May 20th, the Germans that had broken through at Sedan reached the English Channel.  The British withdrew to Dunkirk.  The French were not happy with the British.  On May 25th Boulogne fell, and Calais fell the next day.  On May 28th, news reached Paris that Belgium surrendered.  Dunkirk held out until June 4th.  The British managed to evacuate over 300,000 troops back to Britain before then, but they left behind their tanks, their trucks, all their heavy equipment.  The evacuation was celebrated, but Churchill remarked that “wars aren’t won by evacuations.”  The panzers had time to reorganize, re-equip, and catch their breath and began the push south toward Paris on June 5th.  After three days of fighting, Rommel reached the Seine.  On June 10th, the French government fled Paris.  Two days after Paris fell, Petain [who by then was Prime Minister] asked the Germans for an armistice. 

Hitler insisted on using the same railroad car in Compiegne used to sign the armistice that ended World War I.  The Battle of France was over.  It took Hitler’s Wermacht five weeks to do what the Kaiser’s armies couldn’t do in four years.

Sources:
The World at War - France Falls: May-June 1940
Heinz Guderian - Achtung Panzer!
Erich von Manstein - Lost Victories




No comments: