UKIP and Brexit

What happens when a political party’s single most important goal is actually achieved?  I ask because of what happened in the UK this week.  The UK Independence Party was founded in 1991.  It’s a hard Eurosceptic party.  Their core issue is to get the UK out of the European Union.  Well, the Coyote caught the Roadrunner.  The British electorate voted to leave the EU.  Now what?  UKIP has one Member of Parliament [MP], and it isn’t Nigel Farage.  While sitting in a Frankfurt hotel I heard him on the BBC, saying that what Britain needs now is a “Brexit government.”  How’s that going to work?  He’s not going to lead it.  The ironic thing about UKIP is they have more Members of the European Parliament [MEPs] [24 so far] than they do MPs in their own British Parliament [1 – Douglas Carswell].  When the UK leaves the EU within the next two years, so too will the UKIP MEPs.  Now that their single issue has come to pass, how will the UKIP adapt post-Brexit?  Other than the aforementioned issue, I have no idea what that party stands for.   

This got me thinking about our own Republican Party.  During the good old days of the Cold War, when we knew who our enemy was, the Republicans practically owned the national security issue.  They portrayed themselves as the toughest to fight the Soviet “evil empire.”  Since the end of World War II, three Republican tickets [Eisenhower/Nixon, Nixon/Agnew, and Reagan/Bush] were elected and re-elected.  The elder Bush even won an election in his own right after Reagan was forced out by term limits.  Then like a bolt from the blue, the dominoes we thought would fall in Southeast Asia after Vietnam’s defeat fell in Eastern Europe instead.  When the Berlin Wall came down in October 1989, it was the beginning of the end for the Communists.  Even the Soviet Union disappeared in December 1991.  The enemy was gone, and the Soviet specter was replaced by the phrase “it’s the economy, stupid!”  With that backdrop, Bush didn’t stand a chance against Bill Clinton in 1992.  Since George Bush’s election, three presidents were elected to serve for eight years each - two of them were Democrats.  

On September 11, 2001, the Twin Towers came down.  As I sat in a Godfather’s Pizza place in Sacramento that day, it occurred to me that because of what happened on that day, the Republicans had a new lease on life – the war on terror.  In my mind it was the new Cold War.  Or so I thought.  Fifteen years have passed since that awful day, and for some memories have faded.  So too has the Republican Party.  For decades the Republicans have been portrayed as the “party of the rich”, never mind that more rich people seem to support Democrats these days.  In the fifteen years since 9/11, the war on terror has worked for Republicans a grand total of one time, in 2004.  What happened since then was a war in Iraq that was badly bungled.  There was the Afghanistan fight that has never ended.  Since the end of the Cold War the Republicans have become an opposition party rather than a party that governs.  When Democrats win the White House and Congress, they tend to go hog wild with the things they want to do.  They can’t help it - it’s what they do.  The United States being for the most part a center-right country, there is the inevitable backlash and they elect Republicans as a check on Democratic power.  If we have a government that “does nothing” it’s because the American electorate want it that way.  That electoral success just doesn’t translate to the Presidential level.

Banned!

Congratulations, Russia!  Your past has finally caught up with you.  For the first time ever, an entire class of athletes from a specific country have been banned from the Olympics because of cheating.  The International Association of Athletics Federations [IAAF] banned Russia’s entire track and field team from competing in the 2016 Rio Summer Olympics.  The World Anti-Doping Agency [WADA] established an Independent Commission to conduct an inquiry into the allegations made by the German broadcaster ARD.  The Independent Commission verified the broadcast’s claims, the report of which detailed a culture of cheating in Russian athletics supported by the Russian state.  After the Independent Commission published its report last November, the IAAF banned Russia’s track and field athletes from international competitions.  They told the Russians to get their act together or face the consequence, that being the IAAF would make the ban stick and apply it to this year’s Olympics.  Perhaps Russia thought the IAAF was bluffing.

On June 15^th, WADA issued a follow-up report, and apparently the Russians didn’t get the message.  Maybe they think that because they are a “great power” the rules that apply to everyone else don’t apply to them.  Some of the findings include [but are not limited to] the following:  

--Doping Control Officers [DCOs] faced intimidation and threats of expulsion from Russian security services;  

--Packages containing samples from tested athletes were tampered with by Russian customs officials; --Security staff created significant delays for DCOs in entering venues and consistently monitored once inside (Race Walking in February and Wrestling in May);  

--Schedules not released until the day prior to or day of competition;  

--Challenging to find events because at times only a region is provided for the location, not a specific venue or city;  

--736 drug tests of Russian athletes were canceled for various reasons  

• 669 due to sample collection authority lack of capacity  
• 2 due to athletes "retiring"  
• 25 as a result in change of whereabouts  
• 40 recorded due to “other reasons”  
• 22 requests to test at competitions declined  

--National Championships for Olympic Sports including Olympic qualifiers held in cities with restricted access due to ongoing civil conflicts resulting in service providers declining test requests;  

--Military cities often used as location of whereabouts [athletes know that special permission is needed to gain access].   

Vladimir Putin complains this is “mass punishment” and that banning all Russian track and field athletes is unfair.  Putin of all people should be well aware of the concept of “mass punishment.”  He served a regime that: 1) deported thousands of Lithuanian, Estonian and Latvian intellectuals to Siberia 75 years ago this week [most didn’t return]; 2) deported thousands of Crimean Tatars to Siberia in 1944 for alleged collaboration with the Nazis; 3) executed thousands of Polish military officers and intellectuals in 1940 [Katyn Forest] for the crime of being Polish and for having independent thought; and 4) unleashed the Holodomor on Ukraine, an act of genocide that starved millions of Ukrainians to death.  Cries of mass punishment from Vladimir Putin ring hollow.  

The Russians are an interesting bunch.  They’re not satisfied with breaking the rules to get a leg up on their competition in track and field.  Russian “soccer fans” [not unlike English football hooligans before them] are in France for Euro 2016, seemingly for the sole purpose of beating the shit out of fans from other countries just because they can.  Such is their hooliganism that even FIFA is mad at them.  Their behavior is such that FIFA has threatened to disqualify Russia from the remainder of Euro 2016.  This point might be moot in a few days because the team will probably be going home early because of their own ineptitude.  To incur the wrath of FIFA, an organization that has its own significant issues with corruption, takes a special talent.  If FIFA really wants to get Russia’s attention, they could take the 2018 FIFA World Cup away from Russia.  I don’t see that happening, but I can always dream.  

The Russians treat sports the same way they do international affairs.  Because they used to be a great power, they think they have special status and can get away with anything.  But now, not only do they endure political and economic sanction for their bad behavior in Ukraine, they also face sanction from the sports world.  This won’t change as along as Vladimir Putin breathes.  

   

The Collective Putin

A long time ago in another lifetime, I was a History major in college.  My area of concentration was Russia & the Soviet Union.  This was during the Cold War and the Soviet Union was by far the most interesting places to study.  I kept my eye on this area because of what I did for a living [I was an Air Force intelligence officer].  It was fun to be an amateur Kremlinologist.  I was going to write a Master’s thesis on the effects of nationalism on the Soviet Union and whether it would break-up that superpower.  But a funny thing happened on the way to writing the thesis – the break-up actually happened, and for the very reason I suspected.  So after the collapse of the Soviet Union my focus on such things wasn’t as sharp as they had been prior to the August 1991 coup. But Russia’s decision to annex the Crimea in 2014 jump-started my desire to deep-dive back into all things Russian.   

While casting about for sources to get me back up to speed on Russian events, I found Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.  Given that RFE/RL was a child of the Cold War, imagine my surprise that such a thing still existed 25 years after the Cold War ended.  Not only does it still exist, it is flourishing.  RFE/RL is my go-to source for all things Russian.  In particular is their Russian analyst, Brian Whitmore.  He hosts a weekly podcast called The Power Vertical, which provides keen insight to what’s happening inside Russia.  During one of his podcasts, Whitmore referred to “the Collective Putin” and has continued to do so ever since.  What does he mean by “the Collective Putin”?  He doesn’t name many names, but he has mentioned a few on the air to give me a clue where to look for the rest of the names.  It is those people with whom Vladimir Putin has surrounded himself to govern Russia.  It isn’t just one group of people upon whom Vladimir Putin use – there are several circles of people, the membership of which sometimes overlap.  Having scoured many an online publication, this is the best list of names I can compile.  These groups of people have Vladimir Putin in common.  They sometimes overlap, but they don’t meet together.  Putin is one who stands above the fray and is the ultimate arbiter of issues between these groups.  

My first glimpse into the Collective Putin came in March 2014, when the US slapped sanctions against individuals within the Russian ruling elite.  That was a start, but what are the backgrounds of these people?  One such group is known as the Soliviki.  The folks at Global Security say the term siloviki is taken from silovye struktury, loosely translated from Russian as “force structures”.  So siloviki is a blanket term used to describe “men of force”, and these particular men of force have backgrounds in intelligence, state-security, and military with ties to the KGB, the Federal Security Service (FSB), the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), or even the armed forces.  As former-KGB, Vladimir Putin is a silovik.  The siloviki are the kind of people with whom Putin is most comfortable.  They offer Putin a direct defense against political threats.  Siloviki are like Marines – Marines think of themselves as “once a Marine, always a Marine.”  So too it is with the siloviki – once a silovik, always a silovik.  Vladimir Putin is quoted as saying “there is no such thing as a former Chekist.”  When the Soviet Union was on the cusp of collapse, Putin transitioned from KBG to politics in the civilian world, and wherever he’s gone in his career, the siloviki have gone with him.  Brian Whitmore refers to the siloviki has Putin’s “sword and shield.”   

Putin has managed to put his fellow siloviki in positions of government. He has also placed them in positions of authority in industries [most especially the energy sector and weapons manufacturing] and media that Putin uses as tools to cajole or coerce other countries to help Russia’s interests.  Putin’s Russia is a Chekist corporate state.  But this Chekist corporate state has no interest in Communist ideology.  Their interest is money and power.  Below is just a sample of those who have been along for the ride with Putin:  

                                                      Table 1:  Putin’s Siloviki

Silovik	Connection to Putin	Positions Held
Igor Sechin	GRU	-        Putin’s Chief of Staff, 1994-96 -        Putin’s deputy, Presidential Property Management Dept -        Deputy Chief of Putin’s presidential Admin, 1999-2008 -        CEO of Rosneft Oil Company, 2004-present
Sergei Ivanov	Leningrad KGB	-        Deputy FSB director overseeing analysis, forecasting, and strategic planning, 1998-99 -        Secretary, Security Council, 1999-2001 -        Defense Minister, 2001-07 -        Deputy Prime Minister, 2005-07 -        First Deputy Prime Minister, 2007-08 -        Chairman, United Aircraft Corporation (OAK), 2006-present
Nikolai Patrushev	Leningrad KGB	-        FSB Director, 1999-2008 -        Secretary, Security Council, 2008-present
Alexander Bortnikov	Leningrad KGB	-        FSB Director, 2008-present -        FSB Deputy Director, 2004-08 -        Chief, St. Petersburg FBS, 2003-04
Nikolay Tokarev	Dresden KGB	-        President of the Russian oil company Zarubezhneft, 2000-07 -        President of the Russian pipeline company Transneft, 2007-present
Sergei Naryshkin	Leningrad KGB	-        Chairman of the Board of Directors, Channel One, 2006-present -        Deputy Prime Minister for external economic activity, 2007-08 -        Chairman of the State Duma, 2011-present
Viktor Ivanov	Leningrad KGB	-        Director General of Almaz-Antey [Anti-aircraft] -        Head of the Internal Security Department of FSB -        Director, Federal Drug Control Service [FSKN], 2008-16 -        Deputy Head of the Presidential Staff for personnel, 2000-present
Viktor Cherkesov	Leningrad KGB/FSB	-        Director St. Petersburg FSB, 1992-98 -        First Deputy Director of FSB, 1998-2000 -        Putin's envoy to the Northwest Federal District, 2000-03 -        Director, Federal Drug Control Service [FSKN], 2004-08 -        Head of the Federal Service for Exports of Arms, Military and Special Equipment, 2008-present
Aleksandr Grigoryev	Leningrad KGB	-        Deputy Director of FSB, 1998-2001 -        Director of the Russian State Reserves Agency, 2001-04 -        Director of the Federal State Reserves Agency, 2004-08 [his death]
Sergei Chemezov	Dresden KGB	-        CEO of Rostec defense and industrial group - “Putin’s arms trader”
Andrei Belyaninov	Dresden KGB	-        Director General of Rosoboronexport, 2000-04 -        Director, Federal Defense Order Service, 2004-06 -        Director, Federal Customs Service [FTS], 2006-16

Vladimir Putin was born in Leningrad [now St. Petersburg] in 1952.  After graduating from the Leningrad State University, Putin joined the KGB.  He worked in counterintelligence before transferring to another directorate to monitor foreigners and the myriad consular officials in Leningrad.  After serving the KGB in Leningrad for 10 years, Putin moved to Dresden in East Germany.  After East Germany dissolved and became part of the Federal Republic of Germany, Putin went back to Leningrad.   Beginning in 1991, he started to work for Anatoly Sobchak, the city’s mayor.  It was during his time in the Leningrad/St. Petersburg government that Putin chaired what was the Director of the Committee for Foreign Liaison [KVS].  It was here that he immediately began to gather around himself the core group of people who would work with him throughout the 1990s and into his presidency.  Some of those people were fellow siloviki.  Others came from Komsomol, legal and business circles.   

Deputy Mayor of St. Petersburg

Between 1991-95, Vladimir Putin served first as a deputy mayor, then first deputy mayor [first among equals] of St. Petersburg under Mayor Anatoly Sobchak.  In this position Putin was responsible for oversight of all law enforcement, the Administrative Directorate of the city, the Hotel Directorate, the Justice Department, the Registration Chamber, and the Public Relations Directorate.  At the beginning of his tenure as deputy mayor, Putin was also still in the KGB’s active reserves until at least August 1991.  As a former KGB operative in East Germany, with dealings in East‑West German economic relations, Putin had more experience than most Russians in foreign economic relations.  

With this experience he was able to secure for himself the post of Director of the Committee for Foreign Liaison [KVS].  Here he was responsible for encouraging, regulating, and licensing foreign investment in St. Petersburg and Russian investment through St. Petersburg abroad.  He was uniquely positioned to regulate the movement of money, goods, and services into and out of Russia’s largest trading city.  Businesses that wanted to be established legally in St. Petersburg had to be licensed and registered by Putin’s KVS.  Putin dealt with literally thousands of foreign and native investors, from Coca‑Cola to organized crime bosses. 

When Putin went to work for Sobchak, he immediately began to gather around himself the core group of people who would work with him throughout the 1990s and into his presidency.  Here are just some of those people:  

                                                 Table 2:  Putin’s St. Petersburg Cadre

	Function in St. Petersburg	Position(s) after St. Petersburg
Igor Sechin	-        Putin’s Chief of Staff, 1991-96	See Table 1, Putin’s Siloviki
Viktor Zubkov	-        Deputy Chairman of the External Relations Committee, 1992-93 -        Department of the State Tax Inspection, 1993-98	-        Prime Minister, 2007-08 -        First Deputy Prime Minister, 2008-12 -        Chairman, Gazprom, 2008-present
Dmitri Medvedev	-        Adviser to Mayor Anatoly Sobchak -        Legal Counsel to KVS -        Friend of Vladimir	-        Chairman, Gazprom, 2002-08 -        Presidential chief of staff, 2003-05 -        First Deputy Prime Minister, 2005-08 -        President of Russia, 2008-12 -        Prime Minister, 2012-present
Viktor Ivanov	-        Chief of the Administrative Staff of the Mayor’s office	See Table 1, Putin’s Siloviki
Aleksei Kudrin	-        Vice Chairman of the Committee for Economic Reform -        Deputy Mayor, 1993-96	-        Minister of Finance, 2000-11
Sergei Naryshkin	-        Committee for Economy and Finance, 1992-95	See Table 1, Putin’s Siloviki
Dmitriy Kozak	-        Deputy head, St. Petersburg City Hall’s Legal Department, 1990-91	-      Deputy Presidential chief of staff, 2000-04 -      Putin’s envoy to the Caucasus & Southern European Russia, 2004-07 -      Deputy Prime Minister for 2014 Sochi Olympics
Alexei Miller	-        Putin’s deputy at KVS, 1991-96	-        Deputy Chairman, Gazprom, 2002-present
Nikolai Shamalov	-        KVS	-        Co-owner of Bank Rossiya
Vladimir Churov	-        KVS	-        Chairman, Central Election Commission, 2007-16
Vladimir Kozhin	-        Director General of the St. Petersburg Association of Joint Ventures	-        Head of the Presidential Property Management Department, 2000-present -        Assistant to the President for military and technical cooperation

During Putin’s tenure as First Deputy Mayor in St. Petersburg, he made a lot of “friends,” some of them “legitimate businessmen,” some of them not so “legitimate.”  Putin owned a dacha outside St. Petersburg.  Seven of his friends built dachas near his and together they formed a gated community called the Ozero Dacha Consumer Cooperative.  

Ozero Dacha Consumer Cooperative

All the cooperative members have assumed top positions in government and industry and have made lots of money.  A gated community of dachas on the banks of Lake Komsomolskoye, on the Karelian Isthmus near St. Petersburg.  On November 10, 1996 the eight members of this gated community [including Vladimir Putin], formed a housing cooperative.  Included in this cooperative is a bank account.  All members of this cooperative are entitled by Russian law to deposit or withdraw funds for their own personal use.  It’s a “share the wealth” bank account.  Karen Dawisha, author of Putin’s Kleptocracy:  Who Owns Russia? concluded this bank account is just one of many ways Vladimir Putin can receive money from others directly.  

Leader:  Vladimir Smirnov - Appointed by Putin to head of Tekhsnabeksport, one of the world’s largest suppliers of nuclear goods and services to foreign governments, including Iran.  

Vladimir Yakunin - had been first secretary at the Soviet mission to the UN, a post normally reserved for KGB officers.  Became the federal representative in the Northwest Region for Presidential Property Management Department in Moscow under Putin.  He moved on to become deputy minister of transportation in charge of the country’s seaports in 2000 and then in 2005 became head of Russian Railways.  He was relieved of his duties at Russian Railways in early 2016.  

Yuri Kovalchuk - described as “essentially the personal banker for many senior government officials of the Russian Federation, including President Putin.  He’s the largest shareholder of Bank Rossiya, and has been its chairman since 2004.  

Viktor Myachin – Former Director-General of Bank Rossiya (until 2004).  Since 2004 CEO of the investment company "Abros" that is a subsidiary of Rossiya Bank. This investment company owns 51% of the Согаз, a big insurance company in Russia.  

Sergei Fursenko - Head of Lentransgaz, which then became Gazprom Transgaz Sankt‑Peterburg, one of Gazprom’s largest subsidiaries.  

Andrei Fursenko - Appointed deputy minister, then first deputy minister, then acting minister of industry, science, and technology; after 2004 he became minister of education and science.  

Friends of Vladimir

Arkady and Boris Rotenberg – These two have known Putin since childhood.  They share a love of judo and hockey with Putin.  They own the SGM Group, the largest construction company for gas pipelines and electrical power supply lines in Russia.  The US Treasury says the Rotenberg brothers have provided "support to Putin's pet projects" by receiving and executing approximately $7 billion of contracts for the Sochi Olympic Games and state-controlled energy giant Gazprom.  

Gennady Timchenko – a longtime Friend of Vladimir.  He founded the Guvnor, one of the world's largest independent commodity trading companies involved in the oil and energy markets.  He sold his stake in Guvnor the day before the US slapped him with sanctions related to the annexation of Crimea.  He owns the Volga Group, an investment strategy company with stakes in energy and infrastructure.  The Volga Group controls the Stroytransgaz Group [STG], an engineering construction company that was originally a subsidiary of Gazprom. The Volga Group also owns 23% of Novatek, Russia’s largest independent natural gas producer.  

Others in Putin’s Orbit

Vyacheslav Volodin -  First deputy chief of the Kremlin staff since late 2011, Vyacheslav Volodin is one of President Putin's closest advisers. He is thought to have played a key role first in Russia's decision to move into Crimea, before overseeing the annexed Ukrainian region's political integration as part of Russia.  

Dmitri Kiselyov - A controversial state TV anchor who recently became head of the state news agency Russia Today. He is well-known for his anti-Western and homophobic diatribes, as well as his extremely hostile attitude to the protests in Kiev that led to the ousting of President Viktor Yanukovych.  

Vladislav Surkov - Currently a presidential aide, he is regarded as the mastermind of Mr. Putin's successive election victories through his controversial strategy of "managed democracy". He became known as the "grey cardinal" for his behind-the-scenes influence particularly in Putin's first presidential term of office from 2000-2008.  

Dmitri Rogozin - An outspoken deputy prime minister and former Russian ambassador to NATO in Brussels. He shrugged off the sanctions with a tweet that said: "All these sanctions aren't worth a grain of sand of the Crimean land that returned to Russia."  Deputy Prime Minister, in charge of defense and space industry.  

Viktor Zolotov - commander-in-chief of the new National Guard.  He was Putin’s bodyguard for 13 years.  Russian security expert Mark Galeotti refers to Zolotov as “one of President Putin’s most loyal and muscular henchmen”. The National Guard consists of riot police and paramilitary security troops that used to belong to the Ministry of Internal Affairs.  Zolotov reports directly to Putin.  Galeotti makes an interesting and thought-provoking observation:  

In my opinion, it is crucially important that all his life this man was a bodyguard. This profession produces a specific psychology. Military personnel, security officers, and police officers are all indoctrinated with the belief that their task is to protect the people and the state. A bodyguard, on the other hand, is trained to see his job as not to save Russia or the public, but a specific “protected person.”  

The “protected person” is Vladimir Putin.  

When the Soviet Union was still around, Kremlinologists had it relatively easy compared to today.  Back then there was one group of people to watch – the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.  Kremlinologists scrutinized positions on the reviewing stand on Lenin’s Tomb, who was sitting next to whom, who got published in Pravda, who gave the important speeches, or who headed the funeral committee when a General Secretary died.  With Putin, he’s got several power bases, the most powerful of which is the siloviki, but even they have internal squabbles.  He also has loyalty from oligarchs, business circles, and people like Ramzan Kadyrov and Viktor Zolotov.  He brought these people [except Kadyrov, Timchenko and the Rotenbergs] to Moscow, and they owe their positions to him.  I think it is these people that Brian Whitmore had in mind when he coined the phrase “the Collective Putin”.  

Did I miss anybody, Oleg?

• 
  

What's Old Is New Again...The Sports Edition

Whenever I hear of athletes abusing steroids and other such performance-enhancing drugs [PEDs], one of the first things that comes to mind is “East German swimmers.”  I was almost fourteen years old when the 1976 Montreal Olympic Games took place.  Besides Nadia Comenici’s perfection in gymnastics, for me the enduring image of those games is the female swimmers from East Germany.  They were bigger, stronger, and faster than anybody else in the pool.  American swimmers, Shirley Babashoff being the most outspoken of the bunch, complained of being at a competitive disadvantage.  The East German girls were built like men, they sounded like men, and they dominated.  Something was just not quite right.  But the Americans were labelled as “sore losers.”  Then the Berlin Wall came down, and all of East Germany’s dirty little secrets about doping all their athletes were no longer secret.  It turns out the grapes weren’t so sour after all.  

During the Cold War international sports competitions were but one of the stages where countries on both sides of the Iron Curtain competed to demonstrated the superiority of their respective political systems.  To insure their “superiority”, Eastern bloc nations, notably the Soviet Union and the German Democratic Republic [DDR, or East Germany for short] had state-instituted doping regimes for their athletes. The DDR’s Stasi drugged more than 10,000 athletes with performance-enhancing substances, some of them without their knowledge.  East German athletes under the age of eighteen were given “little blue pills” and told they were taking “vitamins”.  Older athletes were sworn to secrecy about their “supplements”.  The East German authorities cared nothing for the side effects these drugs might have on their athletes.  The athletes were considered to be soldiers in the Cold War struggle against the capitalist West and were seen as expendable.  It was a Faustian bargain for the athletes.  Medal-winning performances resulted in certain perks – money, better living conditions, and better cars and other goods than what was afforded to the “proletariat”.  But the price they paid was steep.  These athletes have had myriad health problems.  Some died young, others had miscarriages, stillbirths and children with birth defects.  Others suffer from depression, cancer, liver damage, and damage to their endocrine and cardiovascular systems.  

So why do I bring up past PED abuse by countries that no longer exist?  In keeping with the theme of “what is old is new again”, there’s a huge controversy involving the current crop of Russian athletes and PED abuse.  Last year the German broadcaster ARD entitled “Top Secret Doping: How Russia Makes Its Winners.”  After this exposé aired, the World Anti-Doping Agency [WADA] established an Independent Commission to conduct an inquiry into the allegations made in the German broadcast.  Last November the IC released its findings.  The report is as detailed as it is damning.  Violations reported include [but are not restricted to] and are quoted verbatim from the report:  

Within the scope of this investigation, there is clear evidence of a “Systemic Culture of Doping in Russian Sport” perpetuated, in part, although not exclusively, through coaches and administrators, whose collective actions at times extended beyond mere administrative violations into potentially criminal acts.  

Evidence of extensive PED use is supported and confirmed by audio and video evidence.  It is also documented by witness statements that corroborate the original allegations of the German television documentary and which provide further details regarding the extensive use of PEDs and blood doping within the Russian federation.  

This network created an atmosphere in which an athlete’s choice was frequently limited to accepting the prescribed and mandated doping regimen or not being a member of the national team.  

The coaches wrongfully encouraged their athletes, or athletes chose to believe that all other nations were following similar illicit training methods, thereby creating a self-justification that ‘sport doping’ and the non-enforcement of violations were competitive necessities and perhaps even patriotic obligations.  

The IC investigation found overwhelming evidence against a number of senior national team coaches who were involved in collusion to illicitly obtain details of suspicious ABP testing results against their athletes. Such conduct demonstrates an embedded and institutionalized process designed to secure winning at any cost.  

On the secret whistleblower recordings, coaches discussed with athletes, in their own words, how ABP testing can be circumvented, the problems ARAF has had with preventing ABP from capturing violations of their athletes and what they can do about it in the future, including the suggestion of administering newly developed PEDs that will escape detection.   

Athletes under current anti-doping sanctions were allowed to compete during the period of the sanctions, contrary to a specific Code prohibition.  

There was collusion between the President of ARAF and the laboratory Director Rodchenkov to conceal positive drug tests by swapping clean samples for known dirty “A” samples at the Moscow lab.  Athletes paid both the President and the Director for the benefit of such services.  

Interviews with athletes and secret recordings led to the finding that within Athletics, (which is the only sport that the IC was mandated to investigate) there were a series of high-level individuals involved, who, for monetary payments, conspired to conceal positive doping samples, leading to the conclusion that there was likely a system in Russia for cover-ups in doping.  

The Deputy Director General of the Russian Federal Research Center of Physical Culture and Sports (VNIIFK) provided banned substances to Russian athletes and was very active in the conspiracy to cover-up athletes’ positive tests in exchange for a percentage of their winnings.  

Russian law enforcement agencies were involved in the efforts to interfere with the integrity of the samples.  

Deliberate efforts were made to stretch the time between notice and the provision of samples for analysis, to provide opportunity for obstructive actions in relation to the tests.  

Coaches were complicit in attempting to prevent access to athletes for testing, thereby obstructing the doping control process.  

The IC determined that there were many occasions on which Russian athletes participating in athletics were given advance notice of proposed out-of-competition tests and were thus able to avoid being tested or take steps to render the tests ineffective.  

The IC found examples of the use of false identities for purposes of evading testing.  

RUSADA DCOs [Doping Control Officers] routinely accept bribes from the athletes, thereby ensuring that the doping control test will not be effective.  

The Moscow laboratory is not operationally independent from RUSADA or the Ministry of Sport.  Its impartiality, judgment and integrity were compromised by the surveillance of the FSB within the laboratory during the Sochi Winter Olympic Games.  

The apprehension of surveillance by the staff in the Moscow laboratory caused by FSB representatives regularly visiting the laboratory and weekly discussions occurring between the Moscow laboratory Director and the Russian Security service affect the impartiality, judgment and integrity of the laboratory.  

The IC concludes that there was direct intimidation and interference by the Russian state with the Moscow laboratory operations.  

Why is there such pervasive doping in Russia?  It starts at the top.  Sport is part and parcel of Vladimir Putin’s image.  In contrast to his old, often inebriated and decrepit predecessor Boris Yeltsin, Putin portrays himself as a man of action.  Photos of Putin the Manly Man are all over the internet.  He can be seen swimming the butterfly in frigid waters, playing hockey, sparring with judo partners, fishing, hunting, and riding horseback bare-chested, flying airplanes, driving race cars, riding motorcycles, etc.  You get the picture.  But there’s more than just Putin’s image at stake.  He sees his tenure as Russian president as a return of Russia to “great power” status.  When the Soviet Union was a great power, it was regularly at the top of medal tables in the Olympics and other international sports competitions.  The Soviet Union enjoyed the prestige of being a major sports power.  Putin wants that prestige for Russia.  He has been able to attract major sporting events to Russia – 2013 World Track and Field championships in Moscow, the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics and the 2018 FIFA World Cup.  In 2014 the Russian Formula 1 Gran Prix resumed in Sochi after a 100-year absence.  Events such as these give Putin’s regime legitimacy in the eyes of the international community.  There’s another benefit for the regime.  The construction projects that go with these events give Putin’s cronies more opportunities to plunder the Russian treasury, while they provide Putin “services” as thanks in return.  That’s just one of the ways the system works in Russia – as long as the oligarchs stay out of politics and support the Collective Putin, they get to keep what they steal.  

After publication of the Independent Committee’s report, the International Association of Athletics Federations [IAAF] banned Russian track and field athletes from international competitions over which it has jurisdiction.  The 2016 Rio Olympics is one such competition.  The IAAF is expected to rule next month whether to lift the Russian team’s suspension.  International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach said that if WADA “prove the allegations true, it would represent a shocking new dimension in doping with an, until now, unprecedented level of criminality.”  Bach also suggested the entire Russian Olympic team could be banned from Rio.  Such a thing is unheard of for competition violations.  But it is a sign of the times that such an action is being contemplated, much less discussed publicly.  This discussion would not have happened during the Soviet era.  If the IOC takes action to ban Russia from the Rio Games, this would be a huge blow to Vladimir Putin’s quest for enhanced prestige.  “Great powers” don’t get banned from the Olympics.  Russia would become an international athletics pariah like South Africa was during the time of apartheid.  

A quote from a senior representative of the IAAF Anti-Doping department is in the report:  

“To be frank there is no surprise to anybody that the former Soviet Union countries have a doping culture deeply incurred [sic] in the sport. It works for Russia, it works for Ukraine, works for Belarus, for Kazakhstan, works for all the former Soviet Union countries.”  

What is old is definitely new again…