Things are going from bad to worse in what used to be the Soviet
Union. In July 2014, “separatist” forces
shot down a Malaysian jumbo jet in the Donetsk Oblast. The initial reaction was one of shock,
horror, much finger-pointing between Russia and Ukraine, and much gnashing of
teeth, but in the months since this event it has receded into the background
noise of other events happening in the region.
The European Union and the
United States have imposed several rounds of sanctions on Russia over its
annexation of the Crimea and support for the separatists. The ruble tanked, the bottom fell out
of oil prices and the Russian economy contracted. There are some in the West who believe that
because of these events, Vladimir Putin would hesitate to take any action in
Ukraine to further Russian interests. What
Western decision-makers don’t understand is that Vladimir Putin doesn’t care. Those developments are mere speed bumps on
the way to Vlad’s vision of the way things ought to be. That vision is to keep Ukraine as a
“non-aligned” nation. That means no
partnership with the EU, and definitely no NATO membership. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said “only a
nonaligned Ukraine may escape further territorial disintegration.” Apparently,
Ukraine didn’t get the memo.
In June 2014, newly-elected
Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko took office and began to implement
promises he made during his presidential campaign, mainly those about getting
closer to Western Europe. Later that
same month he signed free trade and association agreements with the European
Union. This allows Ukraine to sell their
goods to the EU duty-free. Mr.
Poroshenko sees complete integration with the EU to be a ten-fifteen year
process. In December 2014, the Ukrainian
parliament passed, and Poroshenko signed, a new law that abandons Ukraine’s
non-aligned status. Poroshenko indicated
that when Ukraine is able to meet NATO standards [his estimation: five-six
years from now], there will be a referendum to decide whether to join
NATO. It is not a coincidence that
fighting between Ukrainian regulars and “separatists” in Donetsk has resumed
since the new Ukrainian law took effect.
Not only has fighting resumed in Donetsk [it never really stopped, but
it has escalated], but now the “separatists” are aiming for Mariupol. Mariupol sits on the coast of the Sea of
Azov. Taking it would be one step toward
establishing a “land bridge” between Russia and Crimea. It would also deny another port to Ukraine,
further strengthening Russia’s hand in the Black Sea.
In September 2014, Russia,
Ukraine, the Russia-backed “separatists” and the OSCE signed the Minsk
Protocol. This agreement was supposed to
stop the fighting in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine [Donetsk and
Luhansk], and create some kind of demilitarized zone from which both sides
would withdraw their heavy weapons. The
cease fire really didn’t take – Ukraine didn’t withdraw its heavy weapons, and
Russia continued to supply the “separatists” with munitions, heavy weapons and
“volunteers.” Russia is engaging in a
“hybrid war,” were commandos without insignia are slipping across the border to
engage Ukrainian troops, and Russian military equipment and material are
appearing in eastern Ukraine where none had been there before. The Ukrainian “separatists” are on the
offensive, but Ukrainian defenders refuse to go away. The front has stabilized, but the separatists
are not content with controlling only 40 percent of the Donbas region. And so the war of attrition continues.
For the foreseeable future,
expect Vladimir Putin to continue to support the Ukrainian “separatists.” In the “no brainer” category, the Russians
will continue to give material support to the “people’s republics” either with
arms and/or “volunteers.” Russia will continue to deny any involvement,
and the West will continue to think economic sanctions with alter Russian
behavior. The Ukrainians aren’t strong
enough to kick these “separatists” out of Ukraine, and the “people’s republics”
aren’t strong enough to defeat Ukraine without Russian help. Ukraine will remain weak and divided. For the longer term, I would expect Russia to
act in Ukraine as they are now acting in Abkhazia. Russia and Abkhazia have entered into a joint
forces agreement, which integrates the foreign policy and the military command
structure with Russia. The Russians now
consider an attack on Abkhazia as an attack on Russia. This arrangement keeps Georgia divided and
weak, and more importantly, out of NATO.
Since I don’t expect that Ukraine will be victorious over the
“separatists,” I would expect the “people’s republics” of Donetsk and Luhansk
to enter a similar arrangement with Russia that it now enjoys with Abkhazia.
1 Feb 15 Update -
Here's an excellent depiction of the current situation in Donetsk and Luhansk that I found on Radio Free Europe's page:
1 Feb 15 Update -
Here's an excellent depiction of the current situation in Donetsk and Luhansk that I found on Radio Free Europe's page:
This one is a little more detailed. How many Ukrainian regulars are in that pocket?
2 comments:
Too pessimistic a view. The rebels did take Donetsk Airport, but have not moved beyond that. They did fire rockets into Mariupol and kill 31 people, but have not moved forward on the ground. The map near Mariupol looks like the rebels have gained ground, but really that lower area hasn't changed since July.
The Ukraine Army has started conscription and says they're building to 250,000 men, against which the 9,000 Russians will not be able to hold a long front. The Ukraine Army is training in Poland to use Western weapons. I expect the Ukraine Army to start an offensive in the spring. The rebel area is too small to be economically independent, and Russia is finding the Crimea so expensive that Putin has stopped talking about "NovoRussia". It will take all summer, but I expect by next year the rebels will have been largely defeated.
VietVet-
First of all, thanks for reading. It is not the first time I've been accused of being a pessimist. Guilty as charged. But for me, being a pessimist allows me to be rarely disappointed. Given that, I hope you are correct in your assessment and I have no problem with being proven wrong on this topic.
Post a Comment